%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
%% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/

%% Created for Scott Nelson at 2019-06-14 12:14:48 -0400 


%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) 
	
@manual{wickham2017,
	Author = {Hadley Wickham},
	Date-Added = {2019-06-14 16:14:22 +0000},
	Date-Modified = {2019-06-14 16:14:44 +0000},
	Note = {R package version 1.2.1},
	Title = {tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the 'Tidyverse'},
	Url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse},
	Year = {2017},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse}}

@article{brms,
    title = {Advanced {Bayesian} Multilevel Modeling with the {R} Package {brms}},
    author = {Paul-Christian Bürkner},
    journal = {The R Journal},
    year = {2018},
    volume = {10},
    number = {1},
    pages = {395--411},
    doi = {10.32614/RJ-2018-017},
    encoding = {UTF-8},
  }
  
  
 @misc{politzer2016,
	title = {Interpretation of coefficients in logistic regression. Retrieved from https://www.polyu.edu.hk/cbs/sjpolit/logisticregression.html},
	url = {https://www.polyu.edu.hk/cbs/sjpolit/logisticregression.html},
	author = {Politzer-Ahles, Stephen},
	year = {2016}
}


@book{Royall1997,
  	title = {Statistical Evidence: A likelihood paradigm, },
  	publisher = {Chapman and Hall, CRC Press.},
  	year = {1997},
  	author = {Royall, R.}
}


@article{wagenmakers_interpretation_2012,
	title = {On the interpretation of removable interactions: {A} survey of the field 33 years after {Loftus}},
	volume = {40},
	issn = {1532-5946},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0},
	doi = {10.3758/s13421-011-0158-0},
	abstract = {In a classic 1978 Memory \&Cognition article, Geoff Loftus explained why noncrossover interactions are removable. These removable interactions are tied to the scale of measurement for the dependent variable and therefore do not allow unambiguous conclusions about latent psychological processes. In the present article, we present concrete examples of how this insight helps prevent experimental psychologists from drawing incorrect conclusions about the effects of forgetting and aging. In addition, we extend the Loftus classification scheme for interactions to include those on the cusp between removable and nonremovable. Finally, we use various methods (i.e., a study of citation histories, a questionnaire for psychology students and faculty members, an analysis of statistical textbooks, and a review of articles published in the 2008 issue of Psychology andAging) to show that experimental psychologists have remained generally unaware of the concept of removable interactions. We conclude that there is more to interactions in a 2 × 2 design than meets the eye.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Memory \& Cognition},
	author = {Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan and Krypotos, Angelos-Miltiadis and Criss, Amy H. and Iverson, Geoff},
	month = feb,
	year = {2012},
	pages = {145--160}
}

  
@article{frameworkAppliedStatsComparison2019,
title = "Multiple perspectives on inference for two simple statistical scenarios",
abstract = "When data analysts operate within different statistical frameworks (e.g., frequentist versus Bayesian, emphasis on estimation versus emphasis on testing), how does this impact the qualitative conclusions that are drawn for real data? To study this question empirically we selected from the literature two simple scenarios—involving a comparison of two proportions and a Pearson correlation—and asked four teams of statisticians to provide a concise analysis and a qualitative interpretation of the outcome. The results showed considerable overall agreement; nevertheless, this agreement did not appear to diminish the intensity of the subsequent debate over which statistical framework is more appropriate to address the questions at hand.",
keywords = "Frequentist or Bayesian, Multilab analysis, Statistical paradigms, Testing or estimation",
author = "{van Dongen}, {Noah N.N.} and {van Doorn}, {Johnny B.} and Gronau, {Quentin F.} and {van Ravenzwaaij}, Don and Rink Hoekstra and Haucke, {Matthias N.} and Daniel Lakens and Christian Hennig and Morey, {Richard D.} and Saskia Homer and Andrew Gelman and Jan Sprenger and Wagenmakers, {Eric Jan}",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/00031305.2019.1565553",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "328--339",
journal = "American Statistician",
issn = "0003-1305",
publisher = "American Statistical Association",
number = "sup1",
}


@article{barr_random_2013,
	title = {Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: {Keep} it maximal},
	volume = {68},
	journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
	author = {Barr, Dale J. and Levy, Roger and Scheepers, Christoph and Tily, Harry J.},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {255--278}}

@phdthesis{archangeli1984,
	Author = {Archangeli, Diana Bennett},
	School = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
	Title = {Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology},
	Year = {1984}}

@article{cornell_etal_2011,
	author = {Cornell, S.A. and Lahiri, A. and Eulitz, C.},
	journal = {Brain Research},
	title = {What you encode is not necessarily what you
store: evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity},
	year = {2011},
	volume = {1394},
	pages = {79--89},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.001}
	}
	
@article{cornell_etal_2013,
	author = {Cornell, S.A. and Lahiri, A. and Eulitz, C.},
	journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	title = {Inequality across consonantal contrasts in speech perception: evidence from mismatch negativity},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {757--772},
	volume = {39},
	number = {3},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030862.}
	}
	
@article{hestvik2016,
title = "Neurobiological evidence for voicing underspecification in English",
journal = "Brain and Language",
volume = "152",
pages = "28 - 43",
year = "2016",
issn = "0093-934X",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.10.007",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X15300274",
author = "Arild Hestvik and Karthik Durvasula"
}

@article{scharinger_etal_2012,
	author = {Scharinger, M. and Bendixen, A.  and Trujillo-Barreto  and N.J., Obleser, J.},
	journal = {PLoS ONE},
	title = {A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others},
	year = {2012},
	volume ={7},
	number = {7},
	doi = {https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040953.}
}

@ARTICLE{Schluter_etal_2017,
	AUTHOR={Schluter, Kevin T. and Politzer-Ahles, Stephen and Al Kaabi, Meera and Almeida, Diogo},   
	TITLE={Laryngeal Features Are Phonetically Abstract: Mismatch Negativity Evidence from Arabic, English, and Russian},      
	JOURNAL={Frontiers in Psychology},
	VOLUME={8},      
	PAGES={746},     
	YEAR={2017},      
	URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00746},       
	DOI={10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00746},      
	ISSN={1664-1078},   
	ABSTRACT={Many theories of phonology assume that the sound structure of language is made up of distinctive features, but there is considerable debate about how much articulatory detail distinctive features encode in long-term memory. Laryngeal features such as voicing provide a unique window into this question: while many languages have two-way contrasts that can be given a simple binary feature account [±V<sc>OICE</sc>], the precise articulatory details underlying these contrasts can vary significantly across languages. Here, we investigate a series of two-way voicing contrasts in English, Arabic, and Russian, three languages that implement their voicing contrasts very differently at the articulatory-phonetic level. In three event-related potential experiments contrasting English, Arabic, and Russian fricatives along with Russian stops, we observe a consistent pattern of asymmetric mismatch negativity (MMN) effects that is compatible with an articulatorily abstract and cross-linguistically uniform way of marking two-way voicing contrasts, as opposed to an articulatorily precise and cross-linguistically diverse way of encoding them. Regardless of whether a language is theorized to encode [V<sc>OICE</sc>] over [S<sc>PREAD</sc> G<sc>LOTTIS</sc>], the data is consistent with a universal marking of the [S<sc>PREAD</sc> G<sc>LOTTIS</sc>] feature.}
}

@article{hestvik_etal_2020,
title = "Abstractness of human speech sound representations",
journal = "Brain Research",
volume = "1732",
pages = "146664",
year = "2020",
issn = "0006-8993",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146664",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899320300202",
author = "Arild Hestvik and Yasuaki Shinohara and Karthik Durvasula and Rinus G. Verdonschot and Hiromu Sakai",
keywords = "Phonemes, Phonetics, Underspecification, Mismatch negativity, Language-specificity",
abstract = "We argue, based on a study of brain responses to speech sound differences in Japanese, that memory encoding of functional speech sounds—phonemes—are highly abstract. As an example, we provide evidence for a theory where the consonants/p t k b d ɡ/ are not only made up of symbolic features but are underspecified with respect to voicing or laryngeal features, and that languages differ with respect to which feature value is underspecified. In a previous study we showed that voiced stops are underspecified in English [Hestvik, A., & Durvasula, K. (2016). Neurobiological evidence for voicing underspecification in English. Brain and Language], as shown by asymmetries in Mismatch Negativity responses to /t/ and /d/. In the current study, we test the prediction that the opposite asymmetry should be observed in Japanese, if voiceless stops are underspecified in that language. Our results confirm this prediction. This matches a linguistic architecture where phonemes are highly abstract and do not encode actual physical characteristics of the corresponding speech sounds, but rather different subsets of abstract distinctive features."
}

@article{baart2010,
	Author = {Baart, Martijn and Vroomen, Jean},
	Journal = {Experimental brain research},
	Number = {3},
	Pages = {575--582},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory},
	Volume = {203},
	Year = {2010}}

@article{bertelson2003,
	Author = {Bertelson, Paul and Vroomen, Jean and De Gelder, B{\'e}atrice},
	Journal = {Psychological Science},
	Number = {6},
	Pages = {592--597},
	Publisher = {SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA},
	Title = {Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect},
	Volume = {14},
	Year = {2003}}

@article{boersma2015perceptual,
	Author = {Chl\'adkov\'a, K. and Boersma, P. and Benders, T.},
	Journal = {Proceedings of {XVIII} {ICPhS} 2015 (article 711). Glasgow},
	Title = {The perceptual basis of the feature vowel height},
	Year = 2015}
	
@article{bowers2016,
  title={Spoken word identification involves accessing position invariant phoneme representations},
  author={Bowers, Jeffrey S and Kazanina, Nina and Andermane, Nora},
  journal={Journal of Memory and Language},
  volume={87},
  pages={71--83},
  year={2016},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}

@article{brysbaert2009,
	Author = {Brysbaert, Marc and New, Boris},
	Journal = {Behavior research methods},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {977--990},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Moving beyond Ku{\v{c}}era and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English},
	Volume = {41},
	Year = {2009}}
	
@article{chladkova2017,
  title={Perceptual adaptation of vowels generalizes across the phonology and does not require local context.},
  author={Chl{\'a}dkov{\'a}, Kate{\v{r}}ina and Podlipsk{\`y}, V{\'a}clav Jon{\'a}{\v{s}} and Chionidou, Anastasia},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
  volume={43},
  number={2},
  pages={414},
  year={2017},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}

@article{chomsky1968,
	Author = {Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris},
	Publisher = {ERIC},
	Title = {The sound pattern of English.},
	Year = {1968}}

@article{cutler2008,
	Author = {Cutler, Anne and McQueen, James M and Butterfield, Sally and Norris, Dennis},
	Publisher = {Grenoble: International Speech Communication Association},
	Title = {Prelexically-driven perceptual retuning of phoneme boudaries},
	Year = {2008}}

@article{delattre1955,
	Author = {Delattre, Pierre C and Liberman, Alvin M and Cooper, Franklin S},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {769--773},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants},
	Volume = {27},
	Year = {1955}}

@article{delattre1962,
	Author = {Delattre, Pierre C and Liberman, Alvin M and Cooper, Franklin S},
	Journal = {Studia linguistica},
	Number = {1-2},
	Pages = {104--122},
	Publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford, UK},
	Title = {Formant transitions and loci as acoustic correlates of place of articulation in American fricatives},
	Volume = {16},
	Year = {1962}}
	
@article{whalen1983,
author = {D.H. Whalen},
title ={Vowel Information in Postvocalic Fricative Noises},
journal = {Language and Speech},
volume = {26},
number = {1},
pages = {91-100},
year = {1983},
doi = {10.1177/002383098302600106},
note ={PMID: 6621206},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600106},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600106}}


@article{huraLindblomDiehl1992,
author = {Susan L. Hura and Björn Lindblom and Randy L. Diehl},
title ={On the Role of Perception in Shaping Phonological Assimilation Rules},
journal = {Language and Speech},
volume = {35},
number = {1-2},
pages = {59-72},
year = {1992},
doi = {10.1177/002383099203500206},
note ={PMID: 1287392},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099203500206},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099203500206},
    abstract = { Assimilation of nasals to the place of articulation of following consonants is a common and natural process among the world's languages. Recent phonological theory attributes this naturalness to the postulated geometry of articulatory features and the notion of spreading (McCarthy, 1988). Others view assimilation as a result of perception (Ohala, 1990), or as perceptually tolerated articulatory simplification (Kohler, 1990). Kohler notes that certain consonant classes (such as nasals and stops) are more likely than other classes (such as fricatives) to undergo place assimilation to a following consonant. To explain this pattern, he proposes that assimilation tends not to occur when the members of a consonant class are relatively distinctive perceptually, such that their articulatory reduction would be particularly salient. This explanation, of course, presupposes that the stops and nasals which undergo place assimilation are less distinctive than fricatives, which tend not to assimilate. We report experimental results that confirm Kohler's perceptual assumption: In the context of a following word initial stop, fricatives were less confusable than nasals or unreleased stops. We conclude, in agreement with Ohala and Kohler, that perceptual factors are likely to shape phonological assimilation rules. }
}


@article{brysbaert2019,
	author = {Brysbaert, Marc},
	title = {How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables.},
	year = {2019},
	journal = {Journal of Cognition},
	volume = {2},
	number = {1},
	page = {16},
	doi = {http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72}
}

@article{denby2018,
	Author = {Denby, Thomas and Schecter, Jeffrey and Arn, Sean and Dimov, Svetlin and Goldrick, Matthew},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {280},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Contextual variability and exemplar strength in phonotactic learning.},
	Volume = {44},
	Year = {2018}}

@book{dresher2009,
	Author = {Dresher, B Elan},
	Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
	Title = {The contrastive hierarchy in phonology},
	Volume = {121},
	Year = {2009}}

@article{durvasula2015,
	Author = {Durvasula, Karthik and Kahng, Jimin},
	Journal = {Phonology},
	Number = {3},
	Pages = {385--416},
	Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
	Title = {Illusory vowels in perceptual epenthesis: The role of phonological alternations},
	Volume = {32},
	Year = {2015}}

@article{durvasula2016,
	Author = {Durvasula, Karthik and Kahng, Jimin},
	Journal = {Journal of Phonetics},
	Pages = {15--34},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {The role of phrasal phonology in speech perception: What perceptual epenthesis shows us},
	Volume = {54},
	Year = {2016}}

@inproceedings{durvasula2018,
	Author = {Durvasula, Karthik and Nelson, Scott},
	Booktitle = {Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology},
	Title = {Lexical Retuning Targets Features},
	Volume = {5},
	Year = {2018}}

@article{durvasulaetal2018,
	Author = {Durvasula, Karthik and Huang, Ho-Hsin and Uehara, Sayako and Luo, Qian and Lin, Yen-Hwei},
	Journal = {Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology},
	Title = {Phonology modulates the illusory vowels in perceptual illusions: Evidence from Mandarin and English},
	Year = {2018}}

@article{eimas_etal1973,
	Abstract = {A series of experiments, using a selective adaptation procedure, investigated some of the properties of the linguistic feature detectors that mediate the perception of the voiced and voiceless stop consonants. The first experiment showed that these detectors are centrally rather than peripherally located, in that monotic presentation of the adapting stimulus and test stimuli to different ears resulted in large and reliable shifts in the locus of the phonetic boundary. The second experiment revealed that the detectors are part of the specialized speech processor, inasmuch as adaptation of a voicing detector (as measured by a shift in the phonetic boundary) occurred only when the voicing information was presented in a speech context. In the third experiment, the detector mediating perception of the voiced stops was shown to be more resistant to adaptation than the detector mediating perception of the voiceless stops.},
	Author = {Eimas, Peter D. and Cooper, William E. and Corbit, John D.},
	Day = {01},
	Doi = {10.3758/BF03214135},
	Issn = {1532-5962},
	Journal = {Perception {\&} Psychophysics},
	Month = {Jun},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {247--252},
	Title = {Some properties of linguistic feature detectors},
	Url = {https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214135},
	Volume = {13},
	Year = {1973},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214135},
	Bdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03214135}}

@article{eimas1973,
	Author = {Peter D. Eimas and John D. Corbit},
	Doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90006-6},
	Issn = {0010-0285},
	Journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {99 - 109},
	Title = {Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors},
	Url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028573900066},
	Volume = {4},
	Year = {1973},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028573900066},
	Bdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90006-6}}

@article{eisner2005,
	Author = {Eisner, Frank and McQueen, James M},
	Journal = {Attention, Perception, \& Psychophysics},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {224--238},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing},
	Volume = {67},
	Year = {2005}}

@article{eisner2006,
	Author = {Eisner, Frank and McQueen, James M},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {1950--1953},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time},
	Volume = {119},
	Year = {2006}}

@article{endress2011,
	Author = {Endress, Ansgar D and Hauser, Marc D},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {77},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {The influence of type and token frequency on the acquisition of affixation patterns: Implications for language processing.},
	Volume = {37},
	Year = {2011}}
	


@article{ganong1980,
	Author = {Ganong, William F},
	Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {110},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.},
	Volume = {6},
	Year = {1980}}

@article{gaskell1996,
	Author = {Gaskell, M Gareth and Marslen-Wilson, William D},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {144},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Phonological variation and inference in lexical access.},
	Volume = {22},
	Year = {1996}}

@article{gaskell1998,
	Author = {Gaskell, M Gareth and Marslen-Wilson, William D},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {380},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception.},
	Volume = {24},
	Year = {1998}}
	
@incollection{darcy_etal_2009,
	address = {Berlin, New York},
	series = {Phonology and {Phonetics} [{PP}]},
	title = {Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation},
	number = {14},
	booktitle = {Variation and {Gradience} in {Phonetics} and {Phonology}},
	publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter},
	author = {Darcy, Isabelle and Ramus, Franck and Christophe, Anne and Kinzler, Katherine and Dupoux, Emmanuel},
	editor = {Kügler, Frank and Féry, Caroline and Vijver, Ruben},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {265--309}
}

@article{Moreton2002,
title = "Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters",
journal = "Cognition",
volume = "84",
pages = "55--71",
year = "2002",
author = "Moreton, Elliott"
}


@article{dupoux_epenthetic_1999,
author = {Dupoux, Emmanuel and Kakehi, Kazuhiko and Hirose, Yuki and Pallier, Christophe and Mehler, Jacques},
doi = {10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1568},
issn = {1939-1277(ELECTRONIC);0096-1523(PRINT)},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
keywords = {French vs Japanese listeners,perception of "illusory" vowels inside consonant c},
number = {6},
pages = {1568--1578},
shorttitle = {Epenthetic vowels in {Japanese}},
title = {{Epenthetic vowels in {Japanese}: {A} perceptual illusion?}},
volume = {25},
year = {1999}
}


@article{gerken2008,
	Author = {Gerken, LouAnn and Bollt, Alex},
	Journal = {Language Learning and Development},
	Number = {3},
	Pages = {228--248},
	Publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
	Title = {Three exemplars allow at least some linguistic generalizations: Implications for generalization mechanisms and constraints},
	Volume = {4},
	Year = {2008}}

@article{gomez2002,
	Author = {Gomez, Rebecca L},
	Journal = {Psychological Science},
	Number = {5},
	Pages = {431--436},
	Publisher = {SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA},
	Title = {Variability and detection of invariant structure},
	Volume = {13},
	Year = {2002}}

@article{gow2003,
	Author = {Gow, David W},
	Journal = {Perception \& Psychophysics},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {575--590},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition},
	Volume = {65},
	Year = {2003}}

@article{hillenbrand1995,
	Author = {Hillenbrand, James and Getty, Laura A and Clark, Michael J and Wheeler, Kimberlee},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical society of America},
	Number = {5},
	Pages = {3099--3111},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels},
	Volume = {97},
	Year = {1995}}

@article{jakobson1951,
	Author = {Jakobson, Roman and Fant, C Gunnar and Halle, Morris},
	Publisher = {MIT press},
	Title = {Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates},
	Year = {1951}}

@article{Jesse2011,
	Abstract = {Listeners use lexical knowledge to adjust to speakers' idiosyncratic pronunciations. Dutch listeners learn to interpret an ambiguous sound between /s/ and /f/ as /f/ if they hear it word-finally in Dutch words normally ending in /f/, but as /s/ if they hear it in normally /s/-final words. Here, we examined two positional effects in lexically guided retuning. In Experiment 1, ambiguous sounds during exposure always appeared in word-initial position (replacing the first sounds of /f/- or /s/-initial words). No retuning was found. In Experiment 2, the same ambiguous sounds always appeared word-finally during exposure. Here, retuning was found. Lexically guided perceptual learning thus appears to emerge reliably only when lexical knowledge is available as the to-be-tuned segment is initially being processed. Under these conditions, however, lexically guided retuning was position independent: It generalized across syllabic positions. Lexical retuning can thus benefit future recognition of particular sounds wherever they appear in words.},
	Author = {Jesse, Alexandra and McQueen, James M.},
	Doi = {10.3758/s13423-011-0129-2},
	File = {:Users/Scott/Google Drive/Scott Senior Thesis /Readings/Jesse{\_}McQueen{\_}2011.pdf:pdf},
	Isbn = {1531-5320 (Electronic)$\backslash$r1069-9384 (Linking)},
	Issn = {1069-9384},
	Journal = {Psychonomic Bulletin {\&} Review},
	Keywords = {perceptual learning,speech perception},
	Mendeley-Groups = {Senior Thesis},
	Number = {5},
	Pages = {943--950},
	Pmid = {21735330},
	Title = {{Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception}},
	Volume = {18},
	Year = {2011},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0129-2}}

@article{jongman1989,
	Author = {Jongman, Allard},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {1718--1725},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives},
	Volume = {85},
	Year = {1989}}

@article{kleinschmidt2015,
	Author = {Kleinschmidt, Dave F and Jaeger, T Florian},
	Journal = {Psychological review},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {148},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.},
	Volume = {122},
	Year = {2015}}

@article{kraljic2005,
	Author = {Kraljic, Tanya and Samuel, Arthur G},
	Journal = {Cognitive psychology},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {141--178},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?},
	Volume = {51},
	Year = {2005}}

@article{kraljic2006,
	Author = {Kraljic, Tanya and Samuel, Arthur G},
	Journal = {Psychonomic bulletin \& review},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {262--268},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Generalization in perceptual learning for speech},
	Volume = {13},
	Year = {2006}}
	
@article{kraljic2008,
  title={First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability},
  author={Kraljic, Tanya and Samuel, Arthur G and Brennan, Susan E},
  journal={Psychological science},
  volume={19},
  number={4},
  pages={332--338},
  year={2008},
  publisher={SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
}

@article{lahiri2002,
	Author = {Lahiri, Aditi and Reetz, Henning},
	Journal = {Laboratory phonology},
	Pages = {637--675},
	Publisher = {Mouton Berlin},
	Title = {Underspecified recognition},
	Volume = {7},
	Year = {2002}}

@article{liberman1957,
	Author = {Liberman, Alvin M and Harris, Katherine Safford and Hoffman, Howard S and Griffith, Belver C},
	Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology},
	Number = {5},
	Pages = {358},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.},
	Volume = {54},
	Year = {1957}}
	
@article{lively1993,
  title={Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories},
  author={Lively, Scott E and Logan, John S and Pisoni, David B},
  journal={The Journal of the acoustical society of America},
  volume={94},
  number={3},
  pages={1242--1255},
  year={1993},
  publisher={Acoustical Society of America}
}

@article{llompart2018,
  title={Acoustic cues, not phonological features, drive vowel perception: Evidence from height, position and tenseness contrasts in German vowels},
  author={Llompart, Miquel and Reinisch, Eva},
  journal={Journal of Phonetics},
  volume={67},
  pages={34--48},
  year={2018},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}
	
@article{logan1991,
  title={Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: A first report},
  author={Logan, John S and Lively, Scott E and Pisoni, David B},
  journal={The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
  volume={89},
  number={2},
  pages={874--886},
  year={1991},
  publisher={Acoustical Society of America}
}

@article{mcgurk1976,
	Author = {McGurk, Harry and MacDonald, John},
	Journal = {Nature},
	Number = {5588},
	Pages = {746--748},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Hearing lips and seeing voices},
	Volume = {264},
	Year = {1976}}

@article{mcmurray2016,
	Author = {McMurray, Bob and Jongman, Allard},
	Journal = {Psychological science},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {43--52},
	Publisher = {Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA},
	Title = {What comes after/f/? Prediction in speech derives from data-explanatory processes},
	Volume = {27},
	Year = {2016}}

@article{McQueen2006,
	Abstract = {A perceptual learning experiment provides evidence that the mental lexicon cannot consist solely of detailed acoustic traces of recognition episodes. In a training lexical decision phase, listeners heard an ambiguous [f--s] fricative sound, replacing either [f] or [s] in words. In a test phase, listeners then made lexical decisions to visual targets following auditory primes. Critical materials were minimal pairs that could be a word with either [f] or [s] (cf. English knife--nice), none of which had been heard in training. Listeners interpreted the minimal pairwords differently in the second phase according to the training re- ceived in the first phase. Therefore, lexically mediated retuning of phoneme perception not only influ- ences categorical decisions about fricatives (Norris, McQueen,{\&}Cutler, 2003), but also benefits recog- nition of words outside the training set. The observed generalization across words suggests that this retuning occurs prelexically. Therefore, lexical processing involves sublexical phonological abstraction, not only accumulation of acoustic episodes. Keywords: Speech perception; Perceptual learning; Phonological abstraction; Episodic models; Spoken-word recognition},
	Author = {McQueen, James M. and Cutler, Anne and Norris, Dennis},
	File = {:Users/Scott/Google Drive/Scott Senior Thesis /Readings/McQueen{\_}et{\_}al{\_}2006.pdf:pdf},
	Journal = {Cognitive Science},
	Keywords = {action,language comprehension,motor planning,sentence compatibility effect},
	Mendeley-Groups = {Senior Thesis},
	Pages = {1113--1126},
	Title = {{Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon}},
	Volume = {30},
	Year = {2006}}

@article{mcqueen2006b,
	Author = {McQueen, James M and Norris, Dennis and Cutler, Anne},
	Journal = {Language and speech},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {101--112},
	Publisher = {SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England},
	Title = {The dynamic nature of speech perception},
	Volume = {49},
	Year = {2006}}

@article{miller_nicely1955,
	Author = {George A. Miller and Patricia E. Nicely},
	Doi = {10.1121/1.1907526},
	Eprint = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {338-352},
	Title = {An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants},
	Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526},
	Volume = {27},
	Year = {1955},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907526}}

@article{mitterer2011,
	Author = {Mitterer, Holger and Chen, Yiya and Zhou, Xiaolin},
	Journal = {Cognitive Science},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {184--197},
	Publisher = {Wiley Online Library},
	Title = {Phonological abstraction in processing lexical-tone variation: Evidence from a learning paradigm},
	Volume = {35},
	Year = {2011}}

@article{mittererKimCho2013,
author = {Mitterer, Holger and Kim, Sahyang and Cho, Taehong},
title = {Compensation for complete assimilation in speech perception: The case of Korean labial-to-velar assimilation},
journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
year = {2013},
volume = {69},
pages = {59--83}
}

@article{mitterer_etal_2013,
title = "Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception",
journal = "Cognition",
volume = "129",
number = "2",
pages = "356 - 361",
year = "2013",
issn = "0010-0277",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.011",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027713001443",
author = "Holger Mitterer and Odette Scharenborg and James M. McQueen",
keywords = "Speech perception, Phonemes, Allophones, Perceptual learning",
abstract = "Recent evidence shows that listeners use abstract prelexical units in speech perception. Using the phenomenon of lexical retuning in speech processing, we ask whether those units are necessarily phonemic. Dutch listeners were exposed to a Dutch speaker producing ambiguous phones between the Dutch syllable-final allophones approximant [r] and dark [l]. These ambiguous phones replaced either final /r/ or final /l/ in words in a lexical-decision task. This differential exposure affected perception of ambiguous stimuli on the same allophone continuum in a subsequent phonetic-categorization test: Listeners exposed to ambiguous phones in /r/-final words were more likely to perceive test stimuli as /r/ than listeners with exposure in /l/-final words. This effect was not found for test stimuli on continua using other allophones of /r/ and /l/. These results confirm that listeners use phonological abstraction in speech perception. They also show that context-sensitive allophones can play a role in this process, and hence that context-insensitive phonemes are not necessary. We suggest there may be no one unit of perception."
}

@article{mitterer2016,
	Author = {Mitterer, Holger and Cho, Taehong and Kim, Sahyang},
	Journal = {Journal of Phonetics},
	Pages = {110--123},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {What are the letters of speech? Testing the role of phonological specification and phonetic similarity in perceptual learning},
	Volume = {56},
	Year = {2016}}
	
@article{mitterer2017,
  title={Surface forms trump underlying representations in functional generalisations in speech perception: The case of German devoiced stops},
  author={Mitterer, Holger and Reinisch, Eva},
  journal={Language, Cognition and Neuroscience},
  volume={32},
  number={9},
  pages={1133--1147},
  year={2017},
  publisher={Taylor \& Francis}
}

@article{mitterer2018,
	Author = {Holger Mitterer and Eva Reinisch and James M. McQueen},
	Doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.005},
	Issn = {0749-596X},
	Journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
	Keywords = {Spoken-word recognition, Phonemes, Allophones, Pre-lexical representations, Selective adaptation},
	Pages = {77 - 92},
	Title = {Allophones, not phonemes in spoken-word recognition},
	Url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X17300748},
	Volume = {98},
	Year = {2018},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X17300748},
	Bdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.005}}
	
@article{nieuwenhuis2011,
  title={Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance},
  author={Nieuwenhuis, Sander and Forstmann, Birte U and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan},
  journal={Nature neuroscience},
  volume={14},
  number={9},
  pages={1105--1107},
  year={2011},
  publisher={Nature Publishing Group}
}

@article{norris2000,
	Author = {Norris, Dennis and McQueen, James M and Cutler, Anne},
	Journal = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
	Number = {3},
	Pages = {299--325},
	Publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
	Title = {Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary},
	Volume = {23},
	Year = {2000}}

@article{Norris2003,
	Abstract = {This study demonstrates that listeners use lexical knowledge in perceptual learning of speech sounds. Dutch listeners first made lexical decisions on Dutch words and nonwords. The final fricative of 20 critical words had been replaced by an ambiguous sound, between [f] and [s]. One group of listeners heard ambiguous [f]-final words (e.g., [witlo?], from witlof, chicory) and unambiguous [s]-final words (e.g., naaldbos, pine forest). Another group heard the reverse (e.g., ambiguous [na:ldbo?], unambiguous witlof ). Listeners who had heard [?] in [f]-final words were subsequently more likely to categorize ambiguous sounds on an [f]-[s] continuum as [f] than those who heard [?] in [s]-final words. Control conditions ruled out alternative explanations based on selective adaptation and contrast. Lexical information can thus be used to train categorization of speech. This use of lexical information differs from the on-line lexical feedback embodied in interactive models of speech perception. In contrast to on-line feedback, lexical feedback for learning is of benefit to spoken word recognition (e.g., in adapting to a newly encountered dialect). {\textcopyright} 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.},
	Author = {Norris, Dennis and McQueen, James M. and Cutler, Anne},
	File = {:Users/Scott/Google Drive/Scott Senior Thesis /Readings/Norris{\_}et{\_}al{\_}2002.pdf:pdf},
	Journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
	Keywords = {action,language comprehension,motor planning,sentence compatibility effect},
	Mendeley-Groups = {Senior Thesis},
	Month = {sep},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {1113--1126},
	Title = {{Perceptual learning in speech}},
	Volume = {30},
	Year = {2003}}

@book{paradis1991,
	Author = {Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-Fran{\c{c}}ois},
	Publisher = {Academic press},
	Title = {The special status of Coronals: Internal and external Evidence: Phonetics and phonology},
	Year = {1991}}

@article{ParrishDurvasula2018,
	Author = {Parrish, Alicia and Durvasula, Karthik},
	Title = {Does priming tap into phonological representations?},
	Year = {in prep.}}

@article{peirce2019,
	Author = {Peirce, Jonathan and Gray, Jeremy R and Simpson, Sol and MacAskill, Michael and H{\"o}chenberger, Richard and Sogo, Hiroyuki and Kastman, Erik and Lindel{\o}v, Jonas Kristoffer},
	Journal = {Behavior research methods},
	Pages = {1--9},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy},
	Year = {2019}}
	
@inproceedings{poellmann2011,
  title={The time course of perceptual learning},
  author={Poellmann, Katja and McQueen, James M and Mitterer, Holger},
  booktitle={The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII)},
  pages={1618--1621},
  year={2011},
  organization={Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong}
}

@article{posner1968,
	Author = {Posner, Michael I and Keele, Steven W},
	Journal = {Journal of experimental psychology},
	Number = {3p1},
	Pages = {353},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {On the genesis of abstract ideas.},
	Volume = {77},
	Year = {1968}}

@book{Praat2016,
	Address = {Version 6.0.19, retrieved 13 June 2016 from http://www.praat.org/},
	Author = {Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David},
	Title = {{Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]}},
	Year = {2016}}

@article{quinn2010,
	Author = {Quinn, Paul C and Bhatt, Ramesh S},
	Journal = {Perception},
	Number = {6},
	Pages = {795--806},
	Publisher = {SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England},
	Title = {Learning perceptual organization in infancy: The effect of simultaneous versus sequential variability experience},
	Volume = {39},
	Year = {2010}}

@manual{rsoftware,
	Address = {Vienna, Austria},
	Author = {{R Development Core Team}},
	Note = {{ISBN} 3-900051-07-0},
	Organization = {R Foundation for Statistical Computing},
	Title = {R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing},
	Url = {http://www.R-project.org},
	Year = {2014},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://www.R-project.org}}

@article{bates-etal-lme4-2014,
    title = {Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using {lme4}},
    author = {Douglas Bates and Martin M{\"a}chler and Ben Bolker and
      Steve Walker},
    journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
    year = {2015},
    volume = {67},
    number = {1},
    pages = {1--48},
    doi = {10.18637/jss.v067.i01}}

@article{dushoffKainBolker2019,
author = {Dushoff, Jonathan and Kain, Morgan P. and Bolker, Benjamin M.},
title = {I can see clearly now: Reinterpreting statistical significance},
journal = {Methods in Ecology and Evolution},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {756-759},
keywords = {hypothesis testing, null hypothesis significance testing, p-value, statistical clarity, statistical philosophy, statistical significance},
doi = {10.1111/2041-210X.13159},
url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/2041-210X.13159},
eprint = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.13159},
abstract = {Abstract Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) remains popular despite decades of concern about misuse and misinterpretation. There are many recent suggestions for mitigating problems arising from NHST, including calls for abandoning NHST in favour of Bayesian or information-theoretic approaches. We believe that NHST will continue to be widely used, and can be most usefully interpreted as a guide to whether a certain effect can be seen clearly in a particular context (e.g. whether we can clearly see that a correlation or between-group difference is positive or negative). We believe that much misinterpretation of NHST is due to language: significance testing has little to do with other meanings of the word ‘significance’. We therefore suggest that researchers describe the conclusions of null-hypothesis tests in terms of statistical ‘clarity’ rather than ‘significance’. We illustrate our point by rewriting common misinterpretations of the meaning of statistical tests found in the literature using the language of ‘clarity’. The meaning of statistical tests become easier to interpret and explain when viewed through the lens of ‘statistical clarity’. Our suggestion is mild, but practical: this simple semantic change could enhance clarity in statistical communication.},
year = {2019}
}

@book{burnhamAnderson2002,
	title = {Model Selection and Multimodel Inference - A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach},
	year = {2002},
	author = {Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson, David R.},
	publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
	address = {New York}
}


@article{burnham_aic_2011,
	title = {{AIC} model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons},
	volume = {65},
	issn = {1432-0762},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6},
	doi = {10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6},
	abstract = {We briefly outline the information-theoretic (I-T) approaches to valid inference including a review of some simple methods for making formal inference from all the hypotheses in the model set (multimodel inference). The I-T approaches can replace the usual t tests and ANOVA tables that are so inferentially limited, but still commonly used. The I-T methods are easy to compute and understand and provide formal measures of the strength of evidence for both the null and alternative hypotheses, given the data. We give an example to highlight the importance of deriving alternative hypotheses and representing these as probability models. Fifteen technical issues are addressed to clarify various points that have appeared incorrectly in the recent literature. We offer several remarks regarding the future of empirical science and data analysis under an I-T framework.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology},
	author = {Burnham, Kenneth P. and Anderson, David R. and Huyvaert, Kathryn P.},
	month = jan,
	year = {2011},
	pages = {23--35}
}

@article{akaike1974,
	title = {A new look at the statistical model identification},
	year = {1974},
	author = {Akaike, H.},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control},
	volume = {19},
	number = {6},
	pages = {716--723},
	doi = {10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705}}

@Article{wagenmakers2007,
author="Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan",
title="A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values",
journal="Psychonomic Bulletin {\&} Review",
year="2007",
volume="14",
number="5",
pages="779--804",
abstract="In the field of psychology, the practice ofp value null-hypothesis testing is as widespread as ever. Despite this popularity, or perhaps because of it, most psychologists are not aware of the statistical peculiarities of thep value procedure. In particular,p values are based on data that were never observed, and these hypothetical data are themselves influenced by subjective intentions. Moreover,p values do not quantify statistical evidence. This article reviews thesep value problems and illustrates each problem with concrete examples. The three problems are familiar to statisticians but may be new to psychologists. A practical solution to thesep value problems is to adopt a model selection perspective and use the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) for statistical inference (Raftery, 1995). The BIC provides an approximation to a Bayesian hypothesis test, does not require the specification of priors, and can be easily calculated from SPSS output.",
issn="1531-5320",
doi="10.3758/BF03194105",
url="https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105"
}


@article{raftery1995,
 ISSN = {00811750, 14679531},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/271063},
 abstract = {It is argued that P-values and the tests based upon them give unsatisfactory results, especially in large samples. It is shown that, in regression, when there are many candidate independent variables, standard variable selection procedures can give very misleading results. Also, by selecting a single model, they ignore model uncertainty and so underestimate the uncertainty about quantities of interest. The Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing, model selection, and accounting for model uncertainty is presented. Implementing this is straightforward through the use of the simple and accurate BIC approximation, and it can be done using the output from standard software. Specific results are presented for most of the types of model commonly used in sociology. It is shown that this approach overcomes the difficulties with P-values and standard model selection procedures based on them. It also allows easy comparison of nonnested models, and permits the quantification of the evidence for a null hypothesis of interest, such as a convergence theory or a hypothesis about societal norms.},
 author = {Adrian E. Raftery},
 journal = {Sociological Methodology},
 pages = {111--163},
 publisher = {[American Sociological Association, Wiley, Sage Publications, Inc.]},
 title = {Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research},
 volume = {25},
 year = {1995}
}


@article{robert2016,
title = "The expected demise of the Bayes factor",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Psychology",
volume = "72",
pages = "33 - 37",
year = "2016",
issn = "0022-2496",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.08.002",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249615000504",
author = "Christian P. Robert",
keywords = "Testing of hypotheses, Bayesian inference, Bayes factor, Evidence, Decision theory, Loss function, Consistency, Mixtures of distributions",
abstract = "This note is a discussion commenting on the paper by Ly et al. on “Harold Jeffreys’s Default Bayes Factor Hypothesis Tests: Explanation, Extension, and Application in Psychology” and on the perceived shortcomings of the classical Bayesian approach to testing, while reporting on an alternative approach advanced by Kamary et al. (2014) as a solution to this quintessential inference problem."
}


@article{gelmanRubin1995,
 ISSN = {00811750, 14679531},
 URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/271064},
 author = {Andrew Gelman and Donald B. Rubin},
 journal = {Sociological Methodology},
 pages = {165--173},
 publisher = {[American Sociological Association, Wiley, Sage Publications, Inc.]},
 title = {Avoiding Model Selection in Bayesian Social Research},
 volume = {25},
 year = {1995}
}


@article{mcCabe_etal_2020,
	Author = {McCabe, C. and Halvorson, M. A. and King, K. M. and Cao, X. and Kim, D. S.},
	Doi = {10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008},
	Journal = {PsyArXiv},
	Month = {April},
	Title = {Estimating and interpreting interaction effects in generalized linear models of binary and count data. Retrieved from <https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/th94c>},
	Year = {2020}}


@misc{simchon_Hochman-2020,
	title = {Estimating and testing GLMs with `emmeans'. Retrieved from <https://shouldbewriting.netlify.com/posts/2020-04-13-estimating-and-testing-glms-with-emmeans/>},
	url = {https://shouldbewriting.netlify.com/posts/2020-04-13-estimating-and-testing-glms-with-emmeans/},
	journal = {I Should be Writing},
	author = {Simchon, Almog and Hochman, Shachar},
	year = {2020}}
	

@article{gelmanCarlin2014,
author = {Andrew Gelman and John Carlin},
title ={Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors},
journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
volume = {9},
number = {6},
pages = {641-651},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.1177/1745691614551642},
note ={PMID: 26186114},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642}
}


@article{gelmanStern2006,
author = {Andrew Gelman and Hal Stern},
title = {The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant},
journal = {The American Statistician},
volume = {60},
number = {4},
pages = {328-331},
year  = {2006},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
doi = {10.1198/000313006X152649},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649}}


@book{mayo_2018, 
place={Cambridge}, 
title={Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars}, 
DOI={10.1017/9781107286184}, 
publisher={Cambridge University Press}, 
author={Mayo, Deborah G.}, 
year={2018}}


@incollection{mayoCox2006,
author = {Mayo, Deborah G., Cox David R},
title = {Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference},
booktitle = {Optimality: The Second Erich L. Lehmann Symposium. Lecture Notes‐Monograph series},
editor = {Rojo, J},
pages = {247--275},
year = {2006},
location = {Beachwood, Ohio},
publisher = {Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS)}}


@article{owhadi_etal_2015,
author = {Owhadi, Houman and Scovel, Clint and Sullivan, Tim},
title = {On the Brittleness of Bayesian Inference},
journal = {SIAM Review},
volume = {57},
number = {4},
pages = {566-582},
year = {2015},
doi = {10.1137/130938633},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1137/130938633},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1137/130938633}
}


@article{stone1997,
	title = {Discussion of papers by {Dempster} and {Aitkin}},
	volume = {7},
	issn = {1573-1375},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018502622516},
	doi = {10.1023/A:1018502622516},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Statistics and Computing},
	author = {Stone, M.},
	month = dec,
	year = {1997},
	pages = {263--264}
}


 @article{senn2011,
 	title = {You May Believe You Are a Bayesian But You Are Probably Wrong},
 	author = {Senn, Stephen},
 	year = {2011},
 	journal = {Rationality, Markets and Morals},
 	volume = {2},
 	number = {42},
 	pages = {42},
 	abstract = {An elementary sketch of some issues in statistical inference and in particular of the central role of likelihood is given. This is followed by brief outlines of what George Barnard considered were the four great systems of statistical inferences. These can be thought of terms of the four combinations of two factors at two levels. The first is fundamental purpose (decision or inference) and the second probability argument (direct or inverse). Of these four systems the 'fully Bayesiani approach of decision- making using inverse probability particularly associated with the Ramsay, De Finetti, Savage and Lindley has some claims to be the most impressive. It is claimed, however, and illustrated by example, that this approach seems to be impossible to follow. It is speculated that there may be some advantage to the practising statistician to follow George Barnardis advice of being familiar with all four systems.},
 	keywords = {philosophy of statistics; decision theory; likelihood; subjective probability; Bayesianism; Bayes theorem; Fisher; Neyman and Pearson; Jeffreys},
 	url = {https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rmm:journl:v:2:y:2011:i:42}
 }
 
 
@misc{simonsohn2019,
	title = {If you think p-values are problematic, wait until you understand Bayes Factors},
	url = {http://datacolada.org/78a},
	journal = {Data Colada: Thinking about evidence, and vice versa},
	author = {Simonsohn, Uri},
	year = {2019}
}


@misc{simonsohn2015,
	title = {The Default Bayesian Test is Prejudiced Against Small Effects},
	url = {http://datacolada.org/35},
	journal = {Data Colada: Thinking about evidence, and vice versa},
	author = {Simonsohn, Uri},
	year = {2015}
}	


@misc{morey2020,
	title = {Bayes factors from all sides: who’s worried, who’s not, and why. Retrieved from https://richarddmorey.github.io/TalkPhilStat2020},
	url = {https://richarddmorey.github.io/TalkPhilStat2020},
	author = {Richard D. Morey},
	year = {2020}
}


@misc{rouder2015,
	title = {Reply to Uri Simonsohn's Critique of Default Bayesian Tests},
	url = {http://jeffrouder.blogspot.com/2015/04/reply-to-uri-simonsohns-critique-of.html},
	journal = {Invariances: A blog about research methods, statistics, infrastructure, cognition, memory, and perception},
	author = {Rouder, Jeff},
	year = {2015}
}	

@article{reinischetal2014,
	Author = {Reinisch, Eva and Wozny, David R and Mitterer, Holger and Holt, Lori L},
	Journal = {Journal of phonetics},
	Pages = {91--105},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?},
	Volume = {45},
	Year = {2014}}

@article{reinischholt2014,
	Author = {Reinisch, Eva and Holt, Lori L},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {539},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization.},
	Volume = {40},
	Year = {2014}}


@article{reinisch_mitterer_2016,
title = "Exposure modality, input variability and the categories of perceptual recalibration",
journal = "Journal of Phonetics",
volume = "55",
pages = "96 - 108",
year = "2016",
issn = "0095-4470",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.12.004",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447015001084",
author = "Eva Reinisch and Holger Mitterer",
keywords = "Speech perception, Perceptual learning, Audiovisual processing, Prelexical processing",
abstract = "Recent evidence shows that studies on perceptual recalibration and its generalization can inform us about the presence and nature of prelexical units used for speech perception. Listeners recalibrate perception when hearing an ambiguous auditory stimulus between, for example, /p/ and /t/ in unambiguous lexical context (kee[p/t]->/p/, mee[p/t]->/t/) or visual context (presence vs. absence of lip closure). A later encountered ambiguous auditory-only stimulus is then perceived in line with the previously experienced context. Unlike studies using lexical context to guide learning, experiments with the visual paradigm suggested that prelexical units are rather specific and context-dependent. However, these experiments raised doubts whether lexically-guided and visually-guided recalibration are targeting the same type of units, or whether learning in the visually-guided paradigm—with limited variability during exposure—is task-specific. The present study shows successful visually-guided learning following exposure to a variety of different learning trials. We also show that patterns of generalization found with the visually-guided paradigm can be replicated with a lexically-guided paradigm: listeners do not generalize a recalibrated stop contrast across manner of articulation. This supports suggestions that the units of perception depend on the distribution of relevant cues in the speech signal."
}

@article{samuel1986,
	Author = {Samuel, Arthur G},
	Journal = {Cognitive psychology},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {452--499},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation},
	Volume = {18},
	Year = {1986}}

@article{samuel1998,
	Author = {Samuel, Arthur G and Kat, Donna},
	Journal = {Perception \& psychophysics},
	Number = {3},
	Pages = {503--510},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Adaptation is automatic},
	Volume = {60},
	Year = {1998}}

@article{samuel2009,
	Author = {Samuel, Arthur G and Kraljic, Tanya},
	Journal = {Attention, Perception, \& Psychophysics},
	Number = {6},
	Pages = {1207--1218},
	Publisher = {Springer},
	Title = {Perceptual learning for speech},
	Volume = {71},
	Year = {2009}}
	
@article{samuel2014,
  title={Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.},
  author={Samuel, Arthur G and Lieblich, Jerrold},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
  volume={40},
  number={4},
  pages={1479},
  year={2014},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}

@inproceedings{scharenborg2011,
	Author = {Scharenborg, Odette and Mitterer, Holger and McQueen, James M},
	Booktitle = {Interspeech 2011: 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association},
	Pages = {149--152},
	Title = {Perceptual learning of liquids},
	Year = {2011}}

@incollection{Schiller_etal2002,
	Address = {Berlin},
	Author = {Schiller, Niels Olaf and Costa, Albert and Colom\'{e}, \`{A}ngels},
	Booktitle = {Papers in Laboratory Phonology VII},
	Editor = {Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner Natasha},
	Publisher = {Mouton de Gruyter},
	Title = {Phonological encoding of single words: In search of the lost syllable},
	Year = {2002}}
	
@phdthesis{schuhmann2015,
  title={Perceptual learning in second language learners},
  author={Schuhmann, Katharina Sophie},
  year={2015},
  school={The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.}
}

@article{sjerps2010,
	Author = {Sjerps, Matthias J and McQueen, James M},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	Number = {1},
	Pages = {195},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {The bounds on flexibility in speech perception.},
	Volume = {36},
	Year = {2010}}

@article{soli1981,
	Author = {Soli, Sigfrid D},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {976--984},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative-vowel coarticulation},
	Volume = {70},
	Year = {1981}}
	
@article{strange1984,
  title={Effects of discrimination training on the perception of/rl/by Japanese adults learning English},
  author={Strange, Winifred and Dittmann, Sibylla},
  journal={Perception \& psychophysics},
  volume={36},
  number={2},
  pages={131--145},
  year={1984},
  publisher={Springer}
}

@manual{tidyverse,
	Author = {Hadley Wickham},
	Note = {R package version 1.2.1},
	Title = {tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the 'Tidyverse'},
	Url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse},
	Year = {2017},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse}}

@article{van2007,
	Author = {Van Linden, Sabine and Vroomen, Jean},
	Journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	Number = {6},
	Pages = {1483},
	Publisher = {American Psychological Association},
	Title = {Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information.},
	Volume = {33},
	Year = {2007}}

@article{vroomen2004,
	Author = {Vroomen, Jean and van Linden, Sabine and Keetels, Mirjam and De Gelder, B{\'e}atrice and Bertelson, Paul},
	Journal = {Speech Communication},
	Number = {1-4},
	Pages = {55--61},
	Publisher = {Elsevier},
	Title = {Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: dissipation},
	Volume = {44},
	Year = {2004}}

@article{yeni1981,
	Author = {Yeni--Komshian, Grace H and Soli, Sigfrid D},
	Journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	Number = {4},
	Pages = {966--975},
	Publisher = {ASA},
	Title = {Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: Perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation},
	Volume = {70},
	Year = {1981}}
	
@article{ullas2020,
  title={Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation},
  author={Ullas, Shruti and Formisano, Elia and Eisner, Frank and Cutler, Anne},
  journal={Psychonomic Bulletin \& Review},
  pages={1--9},
  year={2020},
  publisher={Springer}
}

@article{xie2020,
  title={Adding Types, But Not Tokens, Affects Property Induction},
  author={Xie, Belinda and Navarro, Danielle J. and Hayes, Brett K.},
  journal={Cognitive Science},
  volume={44},
  number={9},
  pages={e12895},
  year={2020}
}